Iran’s Got The Right Idea
Posted by: Not The Only One in Government Incompetence, Healthcare, Economics, Government InterferenceI know, pretty startling statement coming from an American, right?
I recently made a new friend, Aaron Lazansky-Oliva a.k.a. Spaze Crafte One. This dude wears more hats than I do, which is pretty impressive. He is a DJ, all-around entrepreneur, music producer, graffiti artist, graphic designer/visual artist, webmaster, blogger, advocate for organ donation, photographer, weekend fourth grade teacher, and retailer (not to mention his colorful background as a Mexican Jew). He is both locally, nationally and internationally known, depending on each proverbial hat.
Aaron and I are currently working on a web design project together (I handle the editorial, he handles everything else) for a major real estate firm in Manhattan. As I spent more time talking to him, I was amazed by his many talents and his entrepreneurial passion. But I was also intrigued by his role as an advocate for organ donation, supporting nonprofits like Donate Life.. His passion for this issue comes from a most personal source:
Aaron’s fiancee Marly suffered from a condition which deteriorated her kidney function to 15 percent and declining. Facing certain death if she did not have a new kidney, Aaron underwent certain diagnostic tests to see if one of his own kidneys would make for a compatible match. Miraculously Aaron and Marly had the same blood type, their DNA matched closely enough, and after several tests Aaron gave his beloved the gift of life. Today, Marley is not in perfect health (who among us are?), but she is far closer to it because of her new kidney.
I checked out Donate Life America and was surprised to learn the following:
- More than 100,000 men, women and children currently need life-saving organ transplants.
- Every 11 minutes another name is added to the national organ transplant waiting list.
- An average of 18 people die each day from the lack of available organs for transplant.
- In 2008, there were 7,984 deceased organ donors and 6,218 living organ donors resulting in 27,961 organ transplants.
Now Marly was blessed to be in a relationship with someone who was genetically compatible enough and was willing to give her a kidney, but what about the thousands of people waiting for vital organs, and worse, the ones who literally die waiting? So I did the math: roughly 100,000 people needing organ donation met by 7,984 deceased organ donors + 6,218 living organ donors (14,202 organ donations total) leaves a deficit of -85798 people needing organ donation. What could be done to fix this huge deficit? The first source of organ donation, the deceased, are naturally limited because you have to wait for the donors to die, and if their organs are healthy enough to be eligible for donation, it means they’ll be alive for many years. What’s more, not everyone gives permission for their organs to be donated upon death, and even if they do, most people die because of organ failure or severe organ injury, so I assume death usually leaves few salvageable organs at all.
I came up with a few creative yet slightly unethical methods of increasing deceased organ donation. Consent to organ donation upon death could be like telemarketing, where you’re automatically assumed to agree to upon turning 18 unless you deliberately fill out a form specifically declaring your refusal. Then the government has to keep this opt-out rule as much a secret as possible by calling it something vague and boring like the “postmortem resource non-allocation option” Given how few of us remember to fill out product warranty cards, rebate forms or voter registration forms, tens of millions of Americans will unknowingly triple the number of deceased organ donations. The government could try something really socialist and make deceased organ donation a federal law (maybe the next phase of ObamaCare? Just kidding!). Maybe we could encourage suicidal people to blow their brains out with a gun instead of jumping out of tall buildings or poisoning themselves, thus leaving their vital organs intact.
The only source that could be expanded is living donors. Organizations like Donate Life could expand their current marketing campaign and urge people even more intensely to donate organs. But then I thought about all the reasons that I might not want to donate any of my organs before I die:
- I don’t know what the future may bring for me, so I might want to hold on to my organs in case my health deteriorates later in life. How much would it suck for me to donate a kidney only to need it 20 years later, end up on the organ donation list and die waiting?
- Again, I cannot see into the future, and donating an organ to anyone on the donation waiting list may mean I may not be able to help a family member (with whom I’d be more likely to be a genetic match) should they need an organ later in life.
- I would have no idea if the recipient of my organ would treat it better than I would; they be restored to full health and end up drinking heavily or doing drugs. My sister used to work as an ambulette driver transporting dialysis patients, all of whom had no functioning livers and had to be hooked up to machines for eight hours a day. One of her patients was a former alcoholic who received a liver and then proceeded to drink until she ruined her new liver. As my sister told me, a year later, she saw her former passenger at the dialysis center, hooked up to a machine and most likely placed dead last on the organ donation list. While this is most certainly an extreme and isolated case, it is also a true one.
Given how bad the situation looks for organ donation in the U.S., I decided to see how other countries dealt with this problem. China addresses their organ shortages by seizing them from executed prisoners. But I imagine China must execute many its prisoners for a lot of questionable reasons, perhaps even for the purpose of harvesting organs. Then I found out about Iran, that’s right, the Axis of Evil (cue scary music). Iran has no waiting list. The U.S. has 100,000 people waiting organ donation; Iran has 0. What’s their secret? The buying and selling of organs is legal in Iran. I stumbled upon a video from Reason which offered a bit more insight on the concept of organ trade.
Organ trade is illegal in the U.S., as is the case with every other country in the world where tens of thousands of people are on organ donation waiting lists. Besides the fact that it allows an organ for everyone who wants it, legal organ trade makes sense in America for a variety of reasons:
- With so many Americans pinned under crushing mortgage and credit card debt, they might actually be willing to part with a vital organ or two.
- Shouldn’t the donor be able to do whatever they want with their own organs, even if that means selling them? Funny how the liberal pro-choice crowd champions abortion, the killing of an innocent, defenseless would-be child in the name of convenience yet fail to get behind organ trade.
- Even if you think the buying and selling of human body parts is disgusting, the fact that so many people die waiting for an organ transplant is even more gruesome.
- The surgeons and nurses performing an organ transplant don’t work for free. Everyone gets paid or benefits as a result of an organ donation. Everyone except the donor, who potentially shortens their own lives by a few years.
If people wish to donate their organs, fine; I’m certainly not going to tell someone else what they can do with their own body. But if something could be done to even up the ratio between those who need an organ transplant to stay alive and the number of readily available organs, shouldn’t we try it? Organs, whether sold or donated, save lives all the same.

Entries (RSS)
January 3rd, 2010 at 1:23 pm
As the death toll from the organ shortage mounts, public opinion will eventually support an organ market. Changes in public policy will then follow.
In the mean time, there is an already-legal way to put a big dent in the organ shortage — allocate donated organs first to people who have agreed to donate their own organs when they die. UNOS, which manages the national organ allocation system, has the power to make this simple policy change. No legislative action is required.
Americans who want to donate their organs to other registered organ donors don’t have to wait for UNOS to act. They can join LifeSharers, a non-profit network of organ donors who agree to offer their organs first to other organ donors when they die. Membership is free at www.lifesharers.org or by calling 1-888-ORGAN88. There is no age limit, parents can enroll their minor children, and no one is excluded due to any pre-existing medical condition.
Giving organs first to organ donors will convince more people to register as organ donors. It will also make the organ allocation system fairer. Non-donors should go to the back of the waiting list as long as there is a shortage of organs.
January 3rd, 2010 at 5:38 pm
What’s so wrong about selling your kidney?
The Big Donor Show turned out to be a hoax. Instead of being a tasteless reality show on Dutch television in which three patients competed for a terminally-ill cancer sufferer’s kidney, it was a stunt to raise awareness of the shortage of organ donors. At which point all the commentators turned their outrage meters back to normal (merely frothing). What a pity. Now that we’ve had our awareness raised, we should be concentrating on some pesky ethical questions. Why, for instance, when we use markets to supply the essentials of food, energy and clothing, don’t we use one to supply us with kidneys? The standard response from ethicists is that kidneys, like life itself, are too important to involve filthy lucre. The supply of transplant organs is best left to good old altruism. But the result of this inability or unwillingness to understand how private greed can, with the correct incentives, be turned to public good. The average wait is two years – but that figure is masked by sufferers who can be on dialysis for nearly a decade. So in the name of ethics – and our refusal to consider an alternative system that actually works – we condemn a number of our fellow citizens to an early and painful death; after years of draining dialysis, of course. This might shock those who consider Iran to be an outpost of Barbary where crazed zealots hunger for a nuclear bomb – but there is no waiting list for kidneys in Iran. In Iran there is also a regulated market in which live donors get paid for their donation of a kidney. It is not a coincidence that when the State offers what amounts to roughly a year’s average income to those willing to save the life, lives actually get saved. It is worth pointing out too that kidney donation itself is of the same order of risk as carrying a surrogate child. In Britain, dialysis costs on average £50,000 a year. Imagine that sum, a figure well over the typical annual income, paid as a fee for a donation; it would surely tempt many to offer up a spare. No one is suggesting that there should be an unlimited market in which desperate would-be donors appear at the hospital, clutching a bloody, self-excised kidney and bargain a price with doctors. But what is surely feasible is a regulated market with financial incentives to encourage the saving of lives. It won’t happen, of course. The discussion will not even begin and preventable deaths will continue all because commonly accepted “ethics” prevent us from accepting that there are some things just too important not to have markets in. Now, that anti-market bias really is unethical.
January 10th, 2010 at 9:05 pm
Dave,
While your suggestion of giving organs only to people who have agreed to do the same is a bit cruel, it also sounds quite fair. It also shortens the list of people waiting for organ transplants while creating a logical incentive for agreeing to donate their organs, so it’s a smart move in the right direction as well.
You commented that UNOS, the organization which manages the national organ allocation system could make this policy change. Well, why don’t they? Are they afraid such a bold move in the right direction would be bad for their public image? How many people would have to die waiting for an organ transplant until they do?
Were you aware that I am a huge fan of John Stossel? The minute I went to lifesharers.org I saw a quote from John Stossel calling your organization “the next best thing to an organ market”. Some people will definitely regard LifeSharers as cruel, but it is a very realistic approach to organ donation. These people are most likely to be liberals, who believe that resources should be seized and re-distributed among everyone, even to those who have submitted far less resources (or even none) than others. For many liberals, wanting something or not having something is the sole reason for deserving it. Your group’s approach deliberately rewards those who pledge to contribute their own biological resources.
Since you’ve taken it upon yourself to promote your organization on my blog, would you be so kind as to return the favor and list this blog entry on your web site’s press coverage page? You’ve made a convert out of me. I always had checked off the back of my NYS ID card, but I think I’m going to sign up with LifeSharers. Maybe we can do some more in-depth cross-promotion in the near future.
February 18th, 2010 at 6:06 am
Terence,
You’ve made many good points about the subject. As moral and benevolent that current system of organ provision may seem, it simply does not work.
Leave it to the Dutch to mass broadcast such a powerful commentary on the status quo. They speak four languages, they smoke pot and love prostitutes…is there anything they can’t do?